TXKN

The leaks · 51 / 86

51% attacks and chain halts

A chain can fail as a chain. An attacker with enough mining power or stake can rewrite recent history. A small validator set can halt, or be ordered to halt.

Rewriting the recent past

Payments that looked confirmed can be replaced if the attacker builds a heavier history. Exchanges wait for many confirmations because of this. A merchant who accepts one confirmation on a small chain is exposed.

A halt

If validators stop, your transfer waits. If a few companies run the validators, a court or a government can speak to those companies. Decentralised is a measurement, not a sticker.

The check is who can stop the chain, not the adjective in the marketing.

Check yourself

Does a logo that says decentralised prove a chain cannot be halted?

No. Count who actually produces the blocks.

After this you can ask how many independent parties would have to stop before this chain stops.

Previous: Governance attacks · Next: Swaps